Washington County · Local drinking-water guide

Leeds water quality

Start with your provider. Find public reports, understand the available results, and see where each fact comes from.

Possible providers
4
Status records through
June 30, 2026
Page facts updated
October 30, 2026

Plain-language summary

What do the records show?

Leeds is linked to 4 possible public water providers in the available records. Match the provider on your water bill before using a report. City and ZIP boundaries do not establish who serves an individual home.

Available measurements include Lead (90th percentile), Nitrate, Uranium, Haloacetic Acids Five (HAA5). They belong to the named provider and sampling period shown below.

Newest annual report listed
Not available
A report year is different from its sample years.
Providers with results here
4 of 4
63 measurements available below.
Newest sample year shown
2023
Results describe their stated sampling period.

A public record cannot guarantee the water at your faucet. For an active advisory, follow the issuing agency and your provider’s current instructions.

What is in the drinking water?

Provider water measurements

These results belong to the provider named below. Some show a yearly average; others show a reported result or range. Check your provider’s original report for the full explanation.

Provider-specific results · UTAH27010

LEEDS DOMESTIC WATER USERS ASSOCIATION

U.S. EPA SDWIS lead and copper monitoring records

Open original source ↗

These are 90th-percentile monitoring summaries for the stated reporting periods. Individual sample dates are not supplied. A reported zero is retained as published; it does not establish that lead or copper is absent at an individual faucet.

Provider-specific measurements for LEEDS DOMESTIC WATER USERS ASSOCIATION
Contaminant or characteristicSample periodReported result or rangeUnitLimit supplied by sourceSource compliance statement
Lead (90th percentile)Lead and Copper Rule monitoring · 90th percentileSource stream: monitoring-period/2021-01-01/2023-12-312021-01-01 to 2023-12-31 (reporting period)0.0025System-level 90th percentile of tap samples for the stated monitoring period. The period boundaries are reporting windows, not individual sample dates. A missing result-sign code is retained as unspecified; a zero is not relabeled as a non-detection. Individual household lead or copper concentrations can differ.mg/LNot suppliedA monitoring-period 90th percentile is not a compliance determination or a measurement of an individual household's water.

Utah IBIS yearly mean drinking-water concentrations

Open original source ↗

These are annual monitoring averages, not individual sample results or compliance determinations. A reported zero does not establish that every sample was below detection. Sampling years are shown separately from the date this site retrieved the data.

Historical annual means from Utah public monitoring records. Latest published years vary by contaminant and provider; seasonal and emergency sources are excluded. Sampling frequency and within-system variability differ. These averages cannot establish an individual tap result, detection status, or current compliance.

Provider-specific measurements for LEEDS DOMESTIC WATER USERS ASSOCIATION
Contaminant or characteristicSample periodReported result or rangeUnitLimit supplied by sourceSource compliance statement
NitrateHistorical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20220.05mg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.

A detection is not automatically a violation. Household plumbing can also affect water measured at an individual tap.

Provider-specific results · UTAH27074

ANGELL SPRINGS SSD

U.S. EPA SDWIS lead and copper monitoring records

Open original source ↗

These are 90th-percentile monitoring summaries for the stated reporting periods. Individual sample dates are not supplied. A reported zero is retained as published; it does not establish that lead or copper is absent at an individual faucet.

Provider-specific measurements for ANGELL SPRINGS SSD
Contaminant or characteristicSample periodReported result or rangeUnitLimit supplied by sourceSource compliance statement
Lead (90th percentile)Lead and Copper Rule monitoring · 90th percentileSource stream: monitoring-period/2020-01-01/2022-12-312020-01-01 to 2022-12-31 (reporting period)0.0006System-level 90th percentile of tap samples for the stated monitoring period. The period boundaries are reporting windows, not individual sample dates. A missing result-sign code is retained as unspecified; a zero is not relabeled as a non-detection. Individual household lead or copper concentrations can differ.mg/LNot suppliedA monitoring-period 90th percentile is not a compliance determination or a measurement of an individual household's water.

Utah IBIS yearly mean drinking-water concentrations

Open original source ↗

These are annual monitoring averages, not individual sample results or compliance determinations. A reported zero does not establish that every sample was below detection. Sampling years are shown separately from the date this site retrieved the data.

Historical annual means from Utah public monitoring records. Latest published years vary by contaminant and provider; seasonal and emergency sources are excluded. Sampling frequency and within-system variability differ. These averages cannot establish an individual tap result, detection status, or current compliance.

Provider-specific measurements for ANGELL SPRINGS SSD
Contaminant or characteristicSample periodReported result or rangeUnitLimit supplied by sourceSource compliance statement
UraniumHistorical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20162.60µg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
Haloacetic Acids Five (HAA5)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20231.00µg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20230.25µg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
Trichloroethene (TCE)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20190.25µg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
Radium-228Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20160.14pCi/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
Tetrachloroethene (PCE)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20190.25µg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
NitrateHistorical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20230.93mg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
ArsenicHistorical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20223.20µg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.

A detection is not automatically a violation. Household plumbing can also affect water measured at an individual tap.

Provider-specific results · UTAH27018

TOQUERVILLE TOWN WATER SYSTEM

U.S. EPA SDWIS lead and copper monitoring records

Open original source ↗

These are 90th-percentile monitoring summaries for the stated reporting periods. Individual sample dates are not supplied. A reported zero is retained as published; it does not establish that lead or copper is absent at an individual faucet.

Provider-specific measurements for TOQUERVILLE TOWN WATER SYSTEM
Contaminant or characteristicSample periodReported result or rangeUnitLimit supplied by sourceSource compliance statement
Lead (90th percentile)Lead and Copper Rule monitoring · 90th percentileSource stream: monitoring-period/2023-01-01/2025-12-312023-01-01 to 2025-12-31 (reporting period)0System-level 90th percentile of tap samples for the stated monitoring period. The period boundaries are reporting windows, not individual sample dates. A missing result-sign code is retained as unspecified; a zero is not relabeled as a non-detection. Individual household lead or copper concentrations can differ.mg/LNot suppliedA monitoring-period 90th percentile is not a compliance determination or a measurement of an individual household's water.

Utah IBIS yearly mean drinking-water concentrations

Open original source ↗

These are annual monitoring averages, not individual sample results or compliance determinations. A reported zero does not establish that every sample was below detection. Sampling years are shown separately from the date this site retrieved the data.

Historical annual means from Utah public monitoring records. Latest published years vary by contaminant and provider; seasonal and emergency sources are excluded. Sampling frequency and within-system variability differ. These averages cannot establish an individual tap result, detection status, or current compliance.

Provider-specific measurements for TOQUERVILLE TOWN WATER SYSTEM
Contaminant or characteristicSample periodReported result or rangeUnitLimit supplied by sourceSource compliance statement
UraniumHistorical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20223.60µg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
Haloacetic Acids Five (HAA5)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20231.00µg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20232.76µg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
Trichloroethene (TCE)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20230.25µg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
Radium-228Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20160.39pCi/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
Tetrachloroethene (PCE)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20230.25µg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
NitrateHistorical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20231.15mg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
Di (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate (DEHP)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20220.65µg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
AtrazineHistorical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20220.11µg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
ArsenicHistorical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20226.60µg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.

A detection is not automatically a violation. Household plumbing can also affect water measured at an individual tap.

Provider-specific results · UTAH27071

WASHINGTON COUNTY WCD - COTTAM

U.S. EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data

Open original source ↗

Provider-specific measurements for WASHINGTON COUNTY WCD - COTTAM
Contaminant or characteristicSample periodReported result or rangeUnitLimit supplied by sourceSource compliance statement
11Cl-PF3OUdSUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.005Reporting limit: 0.005 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
4:2 FTSUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
6:2 FTSUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.005Reporting limit: 0.005 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
8:2 FTSUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.005Reporting limit: 0.005 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
9Cl-PF3ONSUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.002Reporting limit: 0.002 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
ADONAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
HFPO-DAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.005Reporting limit: 0.005 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
NEtFOSAAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.005Reporting limit: 0.005 µg/LMethod: EPA 537.1Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
NFDHAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.02Reporting limit: 0.02 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
NMeFOSAAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.006Reporting limit: 0.006 µg/LMethod: EPA 537.1Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
PFBAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.005Reporting limit: 0.005 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
PFBSUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
PFDAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
PFDoAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
PFEESAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
PFHpAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
PFHpSUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
PFHxAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
PFHxSUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
PFMBAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
PFMPAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.004Reporting limit: 0.004 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
PFNAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.004Reporting limit: 0.004 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
PFOAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.004Reporting limit: 0.004 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
PFOSUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.004Reporting limit: 0.004 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
PFPeAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.003Reporting limit: 0.003 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
PFPeSUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.004Reporting limit: 0.004 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
PFTAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.008Reporting limit: 0.008 µg/LMethod: EPA 537.1Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
PFTrDAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.007Reporting limit: 0.007 µg/LMethod: EPA 537.1Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
PFUnAUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<0.002Reporting limit: 0.002 µg/LMethod: EPA 533Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.
lithiumUCMR 5 monitoringCottam Wells · Cottam Wells Sampling StationSource stream: 20001/EP0012023Collected: 2023-10-23<9Reporting limit: 9 µg/LMethod: EPA 200.7Individual sample result at the named facility and sample point. A < result is below the UCMR minimum reporting level (MRL), not zero. The MRL is an analytical reporting threshold, not a drinking-water limit.µg/LNot suppliedUCMR monitoring results are not a regulatory compliance determination.

U.S. EPA SDWIS lead and copper monitoring records

Open original source ↗

These are 90th-percentile monitoring summaries for the stated reporting periods. Individual sample dates are not supplied. A reported zero is retained as published; it does not establish that lead or copper is absent at an individual faucet.

Provider-specific measurements for WASHINGTON COUNTY WCD - COTTAM
Contaminant or characteristicSample periodReported result or rangeUnitLimit supplied by sourceSource compliance statement
Lead (90th percentile)Lead and Copper Rule monitoring · 90th percentileSource stream: monitoring-period/2023-01-01/2025-12-312023-01-01 to 2025-12-31 (reporting period)0.0034System-level 90th percentile of tap samples for the stated monitoring period. The period boundaries are reporting windows, not individual sample dates. A missing result-sign code is retained as unspecified; a zero is not relabeled as a non-detection. Individual household lead or copper concentrations can differ.mg/LNot suppliedA monitoring-period 90th percentile is not a compliance determination or a measurement of an individual household's water.
Lead (90th percentile)Lead and Copper Rule monitoring · 90th percentileSource stream: monitoring-period/2023-01-01/2025-12-312023-01-01 to 2025-12-31 (reporting period)0.0034System-level 90th percentile of tap samples for the stated monitoring period. The period boundaries are reporting windows, not individual sample dates. A missing result-sign code is retained as unspecified; a zero is not relabeled as a non-detection. Individual household lead or copper concentrations can differ.mg/LNot suppliedA monitoring-period 90th percentile is not a compliance determination or a measurement of an individual household's water.

Utah IBIS yearly mean drinking-water concentrations

Open original source ↗

These are annual monitoring averages, not individual sample results or compliance determinations. A reported zero does not establish that every sample was below detection. Sampling years are shown separately from the date this site retrieved the data.

Historical annual means from Utah public monitoring records. Latest published years vary by contaminant and provider; seasonal and emergency sources are excluded. Sampling frequency and within-system variability differ. These averages cannot establish an individual tap result, detection status, or current compliance.

Provider-specific measurements for WASHINGTON COUNTY WCD - COTTAM
Contaminant or characteristicSample periodReported result or rangeUnitLimit supplied by sourceSource compliance statement
Haloacetic Acids Five (HAA5)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean202316.40µg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean202334.50µg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
Trichloroethene (TCE)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20220.25µg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
Radium-228Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20130.34pCi/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
Tetrachloroethene (PCE)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20220.25µg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
NitrateHistorical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20230.05mg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
Di (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate (DEHP)Historical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20200.65µg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
AtrazineHistorical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20200.11µg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.
ArsenicHistorical annual monitoring average · Annual mean20231.00µg/LNot suppliedThis annual-mean dataset does not determine compliance.

A detection is not automatically a violation. Household plumbing can also affect water measured at an individual tap.

What water systems may serve Leeds?

Possible water providers

Compare the provider name and ID with your bill. These records describe public systems; plumbing inside a home can also affect water at the tap.

01 / Possible provider

LEEDS DOMESTIC WATER USERS ASSOCIATION

Water provider ID: UTAH27010
Reported statusNo reported open violationsAs of June 30, 2026
Open health violations
0
Open testing or reporting violations
0
Annual report year
Not available

Status records, annual reports, and individual sample dates can cover different periods. Check current provider notices before relying on an older record.

02 / Possible provider

ANGELL SPRINGS SSD

Water provider ID: UTAH27074
Reported statusReported open monitoring or reporting violationsAs of June 30, 2026
Open health violations
0
Open testing or reporting violations
1
Annual report year
Not available

Status records, annual reports, and individual sample dates can cover different periods. Check current provider notices before relying on an older record.

03 / Possible provider

TOQUERVILLE TOWN WATER SYSTEM

Water provider ID: UTAH27018
Reported statusNo reported open violationsAs of June 30, 2026
Open health violations
0
Open testing or reporting violations
0
Annual report year
Not available

Status records, annual reports, and individual sample dates can cover different periods. Check current provider notices before relying on an older record.

04 / Possible provider

WASHINGTON COUNTY WCD - COTTAM

Water provider ID: UTAH27071
Reported statusNo reported open violationsAs of June 30, 2026
Open health violations
0
Open testing or reporting violations
0
Annual report year
Not available

Status records, annual reports, and individual sample dates can cover different periods. Check current provider notices before relying on an older record.

How should I interpret this page?

Important limitations

  • City and ZIP boundaries do not identify a household's water provider. Use address lookup for the most specific result.

“No reported open violations” means only that none were reported in the latest available records. It does not mean “safe,” “clean,” or “pass.” Regulatory data can lag local notices.

Where did these facts come from?

Where the information comes from

  • EPA Public Water System Service AreasUnited States Environmental Protection Agency · last successful October 6, 2026Open source ↗
  • EPA Safe Drinking Water Information SystemUnited States Environmental Protection Agency · last successful October 6, 2026Open source ↗
  • Utah Geospatial Resource Center Place BoundariesUtah Geospatial Resource Center · last successful October 30, 2026Open source ↗
  • Utility Consumer Confidence ReportsPublic water system operators · last successful November 2, 2026Open source ↗